Method
Klaro turns the world's press into a single neutral account of each event. There is no columnist and no editorial line — only an open, reproducible pipeline that reads many sources, keeps what they genuinely agree on, and shows exactly where and how they diverge. This page explains, step by step, how that works.
1 · Sourcing the world's press
Klaro continuously reads a large registry of news sources — wire agencies, national dailies and regional outlets — spanning the political spectrum and dozens of countries and languages. Sources are chosen for reach and verifiability, never for their editorial line. The wider and more diverse the input, the harder it is for any single bias to pass unchecked.
2 · Counting independent voices
A single agency dispatch republished by twenty outlets is still one voice, not twenty. Klaro detects rewrites, syndication and co-publication, and collapses them so that only genuinely independent confirmations are counted. This is what separates a fact many outlets truly witnessed from one they merely copied.
3 · Extracting the shared core
For each event, Klaro compares what every source says and keeps the statements that overlap — the factual core that survives cross-referencing. Claims carried by more independent voices, across more sides, rank higher. The core is what all reasonable coverage agrees on, stripped of interpretation.
4 · Surfacing contested points
When sources report incompatible versions of the same detail — a death toll, a cause, a sequence of events — Klaro does not pick a winner. It lays the competing versions side by side, attributed, so you see precisely where the reporting disagrees and can judge for yourself.
5 · Framing and blind spots
The same fact can be told with very different words. Klaro contrasts the loaded terms each side uses, and flags blind spots — facts covered by one camp and left unsaid by another. Neutrality is not just the shared fact; it is also making the divergence in language and emphasis visible.
6 · Scoring reliability
Each event carries a reliability score from 0 to 100. It rises with the number of independent voices, the diversity of their leanings and countries, and agreement that spans the geopolitical divide; it falls with thin, one-sided coverage or unresolved contradictions. The score is computed identically for every event, with no manual override.
7 · In your language
The neutral account — facts, contested points, framing and sources — is delivered in twelve languages. Translation carries the meaning across without adding interpretation, so a reader in Arabic, Hindi or Polish sees the same cross-referenced fact as a reader in English.
What the method does — and does not — do
Klaro reports where sources converge and diverge; it does not decide who is ultimately right, and a widely repeated claim can still be wrong. Coverage depends on what the press publishes, so under-reported stories carry lower reliability by design. Every source is cited and clickable to the original: the method is auditable, and you can always trace a fact back to where it came from.