Andrew Tate’s legal action against CPS over names of alleged victims thrown out
The pair are facing legal proceedings in Romania, where they live, but will be extradited to the UK upon their conclusion to face a combined 21 charges,…
- Center-left2
- Center1
- Center-right2
- Right3
2 agency rewrites / co-publications detected
Summary
The pair are facing legal proceedings in Romania, where they live, but will be extradited to the UK upon their conclusion to face a combined 21 charges, including rape, actual bodily harm and human trafficking. Ms Bennett-Jenkins also said that the CPS unreasonably refused to provide the names despite an assurance from both brothers, backed by £20,000 each, that they would not publicly identify the alleged victims, and also rejected an offer from the Tates to be interviewed under caution from Romania. The charges in the UK relate to offences allegedly committed in a period between 2012 and 2016.
Furthermore, Mr Justice Chamberlain said the profile of the Tates was “not an irrelevant factor” and that the CPS’s description of the two as “notorious” was “not unfair” as it was “consistent with the fact that they are currently banned from all Google-owned social media platforms”. Mr Justice Chamberlain dismissed the brother's challenge, finding it was not "arguable". In court documents, Mr Little also warned of a risk of "interference with the administration of justice" if the alleged victims were named online.
In addition, Andrew, a social media influencer, has described him and his brother as "very innocent men". But Tom Little KC, for the CPS, said in written submissions that the decision was being “kept under review” and that the Tates would be told the names when proceedings “commence substantively” in the UK.
One point remains disputed: Versions opposées — Andrew and Tristan Tate’s bid to bring a legal challenge against the Crown Prosecution… ; CPS says decision to withhold names is due to fears Tate and his brother could identify….
Cross-referenced from 8 sources.
Factual coreconfirmed by several independent voices
The pair are facing legal proceedings in Romania, where they live, but will be extradited to the UK upon their conclusion to face a combined 21 charges, including rape, actual bodily harm and human trafficking.
reliability high5/5 sourcesMs Bennett-Jenkins also said that the CPS unreasonably refused to provide the names despite an assurance from both brothers, backed by £20,000 each, that they would not publicly identify the alleged victims, and also rejected an offer from the Tates to be interviewed under caution from Romania.
reliability moderate2/2 sourcesThe charges in the UK relate to offences allegedly committed in a period between 2012 and 2016.
reliability moderate2/2 sourcesMr Justice Chamberlain said the profile of the Tates was “not an irrelevant factor” and that the CPS’s description of the two as “notorious” was “not unfair” as it was “consistent with the fact that they are currently banned from all Google-owned social media platforms”.
reliability moderate2/2 sourcesMr Justice Chamberlain dismissed the brother's challenge, finding it was not "arguable".
reliability moderate2/2 sourcesIn court documents, Mr Little also warned of a risk of "interference with the administration of justice" if the alleged victims were named online.
reliability moderate2/2 sources
Reported detailssecondary facts, each attributed to its source
Andrew, a social media influencer, has described him and his brother as "very innocent men".
according to GB NewsBut Tom Little KC, for the CPS, said in written submissions that the decision was being “kept under review” and that the Tates would be told the names when proceedings “commence substantively” in the UK.
according to Evening Standard - NewsMs Bennett-Jenkins continued to say the brothers were being treated differently from other suspects and the anonymity decision prevented them for making appropriate preparation for their defence.
according to GB News
Disputedincompatible versions — to verify
Versions opposées
- Andrew and Tristan Tate’s bid to bring a legal challenge against the Crown Prosecution…Daily Mail, Daily Mail (Mail Online) - Home, GB News
- CPS says decision to withhold names is due to fears Tate and his brother could identify…Evening Standard - News, The Guardian - UK
Framing by sidesame fact, different words — loaded terms highlighted
No notable framing divergence.
Blind spotwhat one side keeps silent
Ms Bennett-Jenkins also said that the CPS unreasonably refused to provide the names despite an assurance from both brothers, backed by…
omitted byLeft sideCentercovered byRight sideThe charges in the UK relate to offences allegedly committed in a period between 2012 and 2016.
omitted byLeft sideCentercovered byRight sideMr Justice Chamberlain said the profile of the Tates was “not an irrelevant factor” and that the CPS’s description of the two as…
omitted byLeft sideCentercovered byRight sideMr Justice Chamberlain dismissed the brother's challenge, finding it was not "arguable".
omitted byLeft sideCentercovered byRight sideIn court documents, Mr Little also warned of a risk of "interference with the administration of justice" if the alleged victims were named…
omitted byLeft sideCentercovered byRight side