Paraná Pesquisas discloses poll for governor and senators in Pernambuco
Humberto Costa: 23.4% Marília Arraes: 19.4% Eduardo da Fonte: 18.0% Tulio Gadelha: 17.3% Miguel Coelho: 15.9% Paulo Rubem: 13.5% Could vote for all: 20.2%
- Left1
- Right1
no rewrites detected — all voices distinct
Summary
Humberto Costa (PT): 23.4% Marília Arraes (PDT): 19.4% Eduardo da Fonte (PP): 18.0% Tulio Gadelha (PSD): 17.3% Miguel Coelho (Union Brazil): 15.9% Paulo Rubem (Network): 13.5% I could vote for everyone: 20.2% He did not know/did not say: 11.7% Methodology : 1,500 interviewed by the Paraná Institute Researches in Pernambuco, from 7 to 9 July 2026. The margin of error is 2.6 percentage points, with a confidence level of 95%. Methods of interviews, composition and sample number and even the way a question is asked are factors that can influence the result.
Furthermore, The popularity of Raquel Lyra less than 3 months from the election in Pernambuco, according to research.
Cross-referenced from 2 sources.
Factual coreconfirmed by several independent voices
Humberto Costa (PT): 23.4% Marília Arraes (PDT): 19.4% Eduardo da Fonte (PP): 18.0% Tulio Gadelha (PSD): 17.3% Miguel Coelho (Union Brazil): 15.9% Paulo Rubem (Network): 13.5% I could vote for everyone: 20.2% He did not know/did not say: 11.7% Methodology : 1,500 interviewed by the Paraná Institute Researches in Pernambuco, from 7 to 9 July 2026.
reliability moderate2/2 sourcesThe margin of error is 2.6 percentage points, with a confidence level of 95%.
reliability moderate2/2 sources
Reported detailssecondary facts, each attributed to its source
Methods of interviews, composition and sample number and even the way a question is asked are factors that can influence the result.
according to Gazeta do Povo — ÚltimasThe popularity of Raquel Lyra less than 3 months from the election in Pernambuco, according to research.
according to CartaCapital
Disputedincompatible versions — to verify
No factual contradiction detected between sources.
Framing by sidesame fact, different words — loaded terms highlighted
No notable framing divergence.
Blind spotwhat one side keeps silent
No blind spot detected: every side covers the same facts.
Sources2 sources cross-checked
Left1
Right1