Manchester City agree £116m fee with Nottingham Forest for Elliot Anderson
Anderson is preparing for England’s final Group L game against Panama at the World Cup on Saturday and told BBC Sport this week how he has pushed his club…
- Center-left2
- Center3
- Center-right2
- Right2
5 agency rewrites / co-publications detected
Summary
Previous offers rejected by Forest had been valued at £106m and £120m. Per reports from The Athletic, Forest have accepted the latest bid, the valuation of which is unknown, though they had hoped to bring in a fee greater than the £125m Liverpool spent to sign Alexander Isak last season. Other sources claim the deal is worth up to £130m, which would represent a British record fee, eclipsing the £125m Liverpool paid Newcastle for striker Alexander Isak last summer.
Furthermore, Personal terms will not be an issue. The bet was never made - but Thomas Tuchel is backing him to be a winner at the World Cup and Manchester City are doing the same after agreeing a package worth a reported £130m to sign him from Nottingham Forest. "He a real inspiration to the new generation and everyone is proud of him." Anderson, who played 55 times in all competitions for Newcastle United, made his debut in an FA Cup defeat by Arsenal in January 2021 before joining Bristol Rovers on loan a year later.
In addition, City were believed to have agreed an initial £106million fee with Forest last week, with Daily Mail Sport revealing earlier this month that Evangelos Marinakis was looking to secure a British-record £130m after add-ons. But after a breakthrough in talks, City sources now stress that the deal for Anderson is a straight one-off payment and are playing down the idea that they have eclipsed the £125m that Liverpool paid for Alexander Isak.
One point remains disputed: Divergent figures — Manchester City agree £116m fee with Nottingham Forest for Elliot Anderson. ; City sources insist the fee for Anderson is £116m, which would be a club record, with no….
Cross-referenced from 8 sources.
Factual coreconfirmed by several independent voices
Insufficient core: not enough independent confirmations to retain a shared fact.
Reported detailssecondary facts, each attributed to its source
Previous offers rejected by Forest had been valued at £106m and £120m.
according to Evening StandardPer reports from The Athletic, Forest have accepted the latest bid, the valuation of which is unknown, though they had hoped to bring in a fee greater than the £125m Liverpool spent to sign Alexander Isak last season.
according to Evening StandardOther sources claim the deal is worth up to £130m, which would represent a British record fee, eclipsing the £125m Liverpool paid Newcastle for striker Alexander Isak last summer.
according to Adomonline +3Personal terms will not be an issue.
according to Adomonline +3The bet was never made - but Thomas Tuchel is backing him to be a winner at the World Cup and Manchester City are doing the same after agreeing a package worth a reported £130m to sign him from Nottingham Forest.
according to BBC Sport"He a real inspiration to the new generation and everyone is proud of him." Anderson, who played 55 times in all competitions for Newcastle United, made his debut in an FA Cup defeat by Arsenal in January 2021 before joining Bristol Rovers on loan a year later.
according to BBC SportCity were believed to have agreed an initial £106million fee with Forest last week, with Daily Mail Sport revealing earlier this month that Evangelos Marinakis was looking to secure a British-record £130m after add-ons.
according to Daily Mail +1But after a breakthrough in talks, City sources now stress that the deal for Anderson is a straight one-off payment and are playing down the idea that they have eclipsed the £125m that Liverpool paid for Alexander Isak.
according to Daily Mail +1
Disputedincompatible versions — to verify
Divergent figures
- Manchester City agree £116m fee with Nottingham Forest for Elliot Anderson.Irish Independent
- City sources insist the fee for Anderson is £116m, which would be a club record, with no…Adomonline, BBC Sport, Daily Mail, Daily Mail (Mail Online) - Home, The Guardian — Football, The Guardian — Sport
Framing by sidesame fact, different words — loaded terms highlighted
No notable framing divergence.
Blind spotwhat one side keeps silent
No blind spot detected: every side covers the same facts.
Sources8 sources cross-checked
Center-left1
Center3
Center-right2